Radiological Safety AI Red Team Expert

What You'll Do8

• Draft demanding single-turn prompts inside your own specialty and label each as benign, dual-use, or adversarial.
• Score model replies against the project's policy standard and decide whether each one was handled correctly.
• Write the reference answer for every prompt, spelling out what a correct response looks like and why.
• Explain each judgment in writing so a reader without a radiological background can follow the reasoning.
• Separate routine professional questions from requests that probe for misuse potential.
• Flag prompts where the legitimate and dangerous uses of an isotope or source overlap.
• Keep every prompt and rationale inside unclassified, non-export-controlled material.
• Note where a refusal or an answer crossed the policy line and describe the gap.

Requirements8

• Direct custody, licensing, or security responsibility for radioactive material, not just proximity to it.
• Background as a Radiation Safety Officer, Health Physicist, source security or vulnerability assessor, radiological emergency response specialist, or nuclear medicine physicist / cyclotron RSO.
• Skill at telling a routine technical question apart from one that is fishing for harmful detail.
• Strong technical writing, shown through prior publications, reports, or expert witness work.
• Comfort reading and writing about misuse scenarios in your field over sustained sessions.
• Red-teaming experience preferred.
• Willingness to submit a writing sample or link with your application.
• No reliance on classified, export-controlled, NDA-bound, or prepublication-review material.

Who Should Apply

Radiation safety officers, health physicists, source security assessors, and radiologic emergency response specialists who have held the licence of record or owned source custody. Prior red-teaming or published technical writing helps. Bring a sample that shows you can explain a dual-use judgment to a non-specialist.

Salary Insight